Second Joint Eu-SPRI training for early-career researchers with early-career policy professionals: Mission-Oriented Science-Policy Dialogues

In January 2025 we successfully organised the first edition of this science-policy dialogues training in Paris.

The Second Joint Eu-SPRI training for early-career researchers with early-career policy professionals ‘Mission-Oriented Science-Policy Dialogues’

 

27-30 January 2026 (Online pre-events: 2, 9 and 16 Dec. 2025) Vienna, Austria

The Second Eu-SPRI Early Career Training on ‘Mission-Oriented Science-Policy Dialogues’, co-organised by LISIS and the Austrian Institute of Technology (AIT) will take place in person in Vienna, Austria, from 27–30 January 2026, with online pre-events scheduled for  the 2nd, 9th, and 16th  December 2025.

This unique opportunity brings together early-career researchers and policy professionals to build bridges at the science-policy interface through mutual learning, co-production, and collaborative innovation.

For any queries, please contact the organising team at: scipol_training@umr-lisis.fr

Background

How do we learn to engage in dialogue at the science-policy interface?

Several formats and initiatives for (un-directional) policy advice exist, but bridging between the different environments is not straightforward and requires mutual (bidirectional) learning. In addition, established formats usually focus on experienced researchers and policymakers, and exclude early career individuals, which underlines the importance of (re)educating both researchers and policymakers of the future to systematically collaborate and leverage scientific as well as policy knowledge.

The recent emergence of transformative and mission-oriented Science, Technology and Innovation policies (TIP and MOIP) requires a new and cross-sectoral approach to policy making, thus leaving renewed impetus to build relationships between science and policy in addressing societal challenges.

In 2023, an exploratory initiative called Policy Dialogues Demonstrator (P2D), was launched by researchers from Eu-SPRI partner organisations: Fraunhofer ISI (coordinator), AIT, Ingenio and LISIS (https://euspri-forum.eu/exploratory-initiatives/p2d-policy-dialogues-demonstrator/). This initiative aims to develop and pilot new formats of dialogue between STI policy research and policymaking practice in Europe. This training is one of the demonstrators, to nurture new generations of early career professionals able to navigate within the science-policy interface.

This training is a joint event for early-career researchers with early-career professionals in the policy arena (e.g. ministries, funding agencies, etc.). The aim is to create a dialogue between both groups and in this way, to nurture a new generation of professionals at the science- policy interface. It provides a learning exercise in mission-oriented science-policy dialogues towards:

  • Understanding mutual perspectives, professional values, needs and constraints;
  • Understanding the process of co-production in terms of problems and solutions to improve policy making and
  • Generating reflexivity for increased societal impacts.

Structure of the Training

This training is delivered in three phases:

Phase 1: Online Pre-Events (2, 9, and 16 December 2025)
In the first phase, we organise three online (plenary) pre-events, consisting of three main elements to:

Provide insights into the contexts of MOIP, and the need for dialogues in this regard

  • Provide practical testimonies from (couples of) policy makers and researchers
  • Initiating and preparing the group work of the training.

Phase 2: In-Person Training in Vienna (27–30 January 2026)
The second phase represents the main in-person training event in Vienna (AIT). The aim is to understand the difficulties of the different roles in science-policy dialogues, to understand institutional barriers and to co-develop a policy pitch through group work. Consequently, the training will be a mixture of two main activities:

  • Interactive sessions to understand different roles and competences in science-policy dialogues (facilitated by Lene Topp) Group work to co-develop a policy pitch from problem definition to the design of potential solutions.
  • The groups will consist of four participants of four (two early career researchers and two  early career policy makers) and their work will be guided by mentors

Phase 3: Online Post-Events (Feb–June 2026, dates TBD)
The aim of the online post-events is to constructively discuss this learning exercise, continue creating networks among (previous) participants and share the outcomes with the larger Eu-SPRI community.

Who will attend

There will be place for 24 participants on the ‘Science-to-Policy training’: Twelve early-career researchers that are advanced in their PhD research (3rd year or higher) or post-doctoral researchers and research assistants having obtained the PhD degree in the past five to eight years. Research topics should be related to Science, Technology and Innovation Policies. Twelve early-career professionals in the STI policy arena (minimum 3 years of experience).

Key dates

Applications are now closed for this event.  

Registration period: October 2025

Online pre-events:

Session 1:   2 December 2025 09.30-12.30
Session 2:   9 December 2025 12.00-13.30
Session 3: 16 December 2025 12.00-13.00

Main training event: 27-30 January 2026

Post-event activities: February-June 2026

Exploring Gender, Technology, and Climate Innovation: My EU-SPRI Research Exchange at Politecnico di Milano

 

Exploring Gender, Technology, and Climate Innovation: My EU-SPRI Research Exchange at Politecnico di Milano


Written by An Yu Chen

An Yu Chen is an Early Career scholar researching the linkages between science and technology in emerging green technologies at the IMP Innovation, Strategy & Sustainability group within Alliance Manchester Business School at The University of Manchester. She approaches this topic through three major disciplines: science-of-science studies, innovation studies and sustainability transitions. Her doctoral work investigates how scientific knowledge flows across disciplines to underpin the development of green technologies.

During her EU‑SPRI‑funded circulation at the Entrepreneurship, Finance & Innovation (EFI) group at Politecnico di Milano, she was able to further develop the conceptual framework underpinning her PhD. There, she examined how the scientific knowledge base supports sustainable innovation, enriching her analysis and enabling more nuanced insights into green technology emergence.

In this piece, An Yu shares her experience working in a different academic environment and reflects on how the circulation award helped enlarge her existing networks, deepening collaborations within both Manchester’s IMP group and Polimi’s EFI colleagues.

Fig.1:The Politecnico di Milano was established in 1863

A PhD journey offers many opportunities, but few are as transformative as stepping into a new academic environment. I recently had the privilege of undertaking a month-long research exchange at Politecnico di Milano in Italy, funded by the EU-SPRI PhD Circulation Award. This experience became a catalyst for my intellectual growth, collaboration and personal development.

As a final-year PhD researcher, I had long thought about pursuing a research exchange. I wanted to understand how PhD life unfolds in different parts of the world, and I hoped that new perspectives would enrich my thesis. Thanks to the support of Professor Stefano Baruffaldi, my supervisors Cornelia Lawson and Silvia Massini, and the guidance of Mabel Sanchez Barrioluengo, I secured EU-SPRI funding for this exchange.

The award itself reflected a commitment not only to the advancement of my research but also to fostering personal growth through international mobility.

 

Shaping My Research Focus

Throughout my stay at Politecnico di Milano, I worked on refining a paper that explores the perspective of gender and its indirect influence on interactions between technology inventors and academic authors. Weekly discussions under Professor Baruffaldi’s mentorship helped me sharpen my arguments and clarify my writing.

Initially, my research aimed to cover gender disparity in science and technology, homophily (the preference for associating with one’s own gender), and their impact on innovation outcomes. I chose green technology as my research setting, recognising that gendered personality traits could lead to diverse innovation pathways. However, I soon realised that I was attempting to address too many complex issues in a single paper. Through dialogue and reflection, we successfully disentangled these ideas to build a more focused, coherent argument.

 

 

Learning from Experts and Broadening Horizons

A major highlight of my exchange was gaining practical skills in constructing disruptiveness and novelty indicators which are the key tools for my PhD work. Thanks to the insightful guidance from Daniel Souza and Thomas Feliciani, I deepened my understanding of how scientific indicators can reveal whether novel approaches in research drive technological advancement.

I also attended the META Workshop – Machine Learning in Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios. This event introduced me to cutting-edge discussions in technoscience, focusing on the philosophical, ethical, and societal implications of emerging technologies. I enhanced my proficiency in random forest algorithms and learned techniques for designing robust data architectures in machine learning.

Green technologies are vital for addressing climate change. The workshop broadened my methodological toolkit and deepened my understanding of how innovation contributes to climate mitigation.

 

The Power of Academic Community

My time at the Entrepreneurship, Finance and Innovation (EFI) group was deeply rewarding. From day one, I was welcomed into a vibrant, open environment where spontaneous discussions and collaborative thinking thrived. The EFI Research Seminar gave me a platform to present my work, sparking engaging debates and helping me see my research through new lenses.

Fig.3: The ceiling of the PhD office has plants, and there are staff who come in to water them

The open office design at Politecnico, with glass walls and shared spaces, fostered a unique energy. It encouraged focus and made interactions with colleagues easy and natural. These daily exchanges during coffee breaks and lunches helped me build confidence in sharing and refining my ideas.

 

Cultural Exchange and Personal Growth

Living in Milan also gave me the opportunity to immerse myself in Italian culture. From navigating the metro system to savouring the local cuisine, I found parallels with my own life and learned to appreciate the subtle cultural differences. I believe these experiences contributed significantly to my PhD journey, offering lessons in empathy, adaptability and global citizenship.

This exchange strengthened my research, expanded my academic network and enriched both my personal and professional development. I am deeply grateful to Eu-SPRI for supporting this transformative opportunity. For any PhD student considering research mobility, I wholeheartedly recommend applying for the Eu-SPRI Circulation Award. The intellectual, professional and personal benefits are profound and enduring.